In the
Bhagavad Gita, Krishna makes special mention
of the soul. When the warrior Arjuna declines to fight and kill his relatives, Krishna says that he is not killing anybody, because the
soul is immortal. Just as we abandon worn out clothes take new ones, the soul,
likewise, abandons worn out bodies and takes new ones. It is the body that has
birth and death. Soul does not come in the purview of the mundane laws
governing birth and death. Soul is not cut by weapons. It is not consumed by
fire. It is neither washed away by water nor blown away by the wind. Thus soul
is not destructible by any state of matter or energy.
According
to the Bhagavad Gita, the soul cannot be perceived by material means. In other
words, one can not use tools that characterize matter. Eyes, ears, noses, hands
and mouth which are common tools to probe matter, cannot probe the soul. The
first step, indeed, is to deactivate these biological sensors. By controlling
all sense organs, fixing the mind in the heart concentrating all energy in the
head, reciting the one syllable AUM and engaging in firm yoga, one can probe
the soul. (8:12). this prescription is completely spiritual and is beyond the
reach of a common individual.
Prior to
this, Krishna emphasized the role of knowledge
in understanding the soul. (4:39). He who has faith can acquire the supreme
knowledge about soul. The other requirement, as mentioned earlier, is the
absolute control of senses. In this process knowledge gained would lead the
knower to ultimate peace. In the next verse he says that those who doubt would
perish.
Scientists
are not comfortable with this idea of knowledge by faith and end by doubt.
Science is not inclined to gaining knowledge by faith. Knowledge must be
acquired by experimentation and should be free of all ambiguities. Doubts lead
to further experimentation, which leads to the confirmation of the knowledge.
Thus in the realm of science, faith is not acceptable but doubt ism in contrast
to spirituality, where there is a reversal of roles that is, faith is the buzz
word and doubt is the outcast.
This
perspective apparently points to a disunity between science and spirituality.
However, we cannot entirely rule out a unity in diversity. Spirituality is
mostly intuitive while science is based on experimentation and reasoning. But
many great scientific ideas initially came from the intuitions of their
creators, which were later confirmed by both experiment and theory. There is of
course a common ground. Both science and spirituality are not easily
discernible to a lay person.
Of late
scientists have taken interest beyond their domains. Social, economical and
political domains are explored by considering them as statistical systems with
some common unity. However, in the past these things did come under the purview
of science, except of course in erstwhile Russia , where everything was
considered as science, even religion. Thus a scientific approach to
spirituality is also the need of the hour to porch to life. By doing so, we
could put an end to the compartmentalization of knowledge and begin to see
things from a holistic perspective.
No comments:
Post a Comment